LEAD — Family Business Enterprise
All frameworks
Multidimensional diagnostic

Business Continuity Assessment™

Measures enterprise readiness for leadership, ownership and organisational continuity across ten assessed areas, triangulated across owners, family and senior professionals.

Business Continuity Assessment™ framework in practice
01Why it exists

Establish whether the enterprise can survive the sudden absence of any one individual.

Distinguish structural readiness from human readiness, which rarely arrive together.

Produce a sequenced 12–24 month continuity programme, not a list of concerns.

02The model explained

Ten assessed areas

Leadership depth, decision systems, governance, ownership alignment, next-generation readiness, talent, behavioural risk, information quality, financial discipline, resilience.

Three-perspective scoring

Owner, family and professional management score independently; disagreement is data.

Continuity score and risk map

A single score, a heat map by area, and the sequence in which risks must be addressed.

How it is applied

  1. 01

    Document and decision-record review alongside structured interviews.

  2. 02

    Independent scoring by all three respondent groups.

  3. 03

    Risk mapping, scenario testing of a 90-day absence, and a prioritised intervention sequence.

  • —Scenario testing asks a concrete question: if the promoter were unreachable for one quarter, what stops first?
  • —Re-assessment at twelve months measures programme effect, not intent.
03Continuity risk profiles
Person-Dependent
The enterprise cannot function for a quarter without one individual.
Systems-Ready, People-Unready
Processes exist; no successor is prepared to hold them.
Ownership-Unresolved
Capable business, undecided shareholding intent.
04Sample assessment

Indicative items. The full instrument runs 10 areas × multiple items, scored by three respondent groups.

  • 01

    If the promoter were unavailable for 90 days, banking and statutory obligations would still be met.

    Reads: Operational continuity

    1 – 5
  • 02

    There is a named, informed successor for every critical role.

    Reads: Leadership depth

    1 – 5
  • 03

    Shareholding intent for the next generation is documented.

    Reads: Ownership alignment

    Yes / No
  • 04

    Management reports reconcile to source data without manual adjustment.

    Reads: Information quality

    1 – 5
  • 05

    A serious disagreement between owners has an agreed resolution route.

    Reads: Governance

    1 – 5
05Sample report

Illustrative report — third-generation family enterprise

54

Continuity score

47

Leadership depth

36

Ownership alignment

71

Information quality

Findings

  • —Profile: Systems-Ready, People-Unready. Processes were sound; only one of six critical roles had a prepared successor.
  • —Banking authority rested with a single signatory with no documented alternate.
  • —Family respondents scored ownership alignment 30 points below professional management, who assumed it was settled.

Recommended sequence

  • Documented alternates for banking, statutory and contractual authority within 60 days.
  • Successor development plans with real mandates for four critical roles.
  • Family ownership intent session, facilitated, with documented outcomes within two quarters.

Illustrative composite. Client details are altered and anonymised.

06Case examples

Surviving an unplanned absence

ContextA promoter's extended medical leave exposed single-point authority across banking and contracts.

WorkContinuity assessment, authority documentation and delegation architecture.

ImpactThe group operated a full quarter without escalation; the framework was retained permanently.

Preparing the fourth generation

ContextCapable next-generation members with no defined entry route.

WorkContinuity assessment paired with Role–Right–Responsibility design.

ImpactTwo entrants placed into roles with earned authority and published criteria.